Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice issue.

Data differ drastically on the variety of medical errors that happen in the United States. Some research studies put the number of medical errors in excess of one million yearly while other studies position the number as low as a few hundred thousand. It is widely accepted nevertheless that iatrogenic illness (disease or injury triggered by a medical error or medical treatment) is the third leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As a lawyer who has actually limited his practice to representation of victims hurt by another person's negligence, medical or otherwise, I have received countless calls from potential customers over the last Twenty Years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Since medical malpractice litigation is very pricey and extremely lengthy the attorneys in our company are extremely cautious exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we opt to get involved. It is not at all uncommon for a lawyer, or law office to advance litigation expenditures in excess of $100,000.00 just to get a case to trial. These costs are the costs connected with pursuing the lawsuits which include skilled witness costs, deposition expenses, display preparation and court expenses. What follows is a summary of the issues, concerns and considerations that the attorneys in our firm think about when discussing with a customer a prospective medical malpractice case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractic specialists, dental practitioners, podiatrists and so on.) which results in an injury or death. "Standard of Care" suggests medical treatment that an affordable, prudent medical provider in the exact same neighborhood should provide. Most cases involve a conflict over exactly what the relevant requirement of care is. The standard of care is typically offered through using specialist statement from seeking advice from medical professionals that practice or teach medication in the exact same specialty as the accused( s).

When did the malpractice take place (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of limitations is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the accused dealt with the plaintiff (victim) or the date the plaintiff discovered or reasonably must have discovered the malpractice. Some states have a two year statute of restrictions. In Ohio if the victim is a minor the statute of restrictions will not even begin to run up until the small ends up being 18 years old. Be recommended nevertheless acquired claims for parents might run many years earlier. If you think you may have a case it is essential you call a lawyer soon. Regardless of the statute of constraints, doctors transfer, witnesses disappear and memories fade. The faster counsel is engaged the faster essential proof can be protected and the better your possibilities are of dominating.

What did the doctor do or fail to do?

Merely since a client does not have a successful arise from a surgical treatment, medical treatment or medical treatment does not in and of itself mean the physician slipped up. Medical practice is by no indicates a warranty of good health or a complete healing. Most of the time when a client experiences a not successful arise from medical treatment it is not due to the fact that the medical service provider slipped up. Most of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is despite excellent, quality healthcare not because of sub-standard healthcare.

When Should I Hire A Personal Injury Attorney? - The National Law Review

When should I hire a personal injury attorney is a question many people ask. After you have been injured in an accident, such as car crash, bike or motorcycle wreck, slip and fall, or any other type or mishap, you may wonder if or when you should consider hiring a personal injury attorney. Your decision should be informed by the answers to several questions. After you have thought through each of them, you’ll have a better idea about whether or not you should retain counsel. When Should I Hire A Personal Injury Attorney? - The National Law Review

When going over a prospective case with a client it is necessary that the client be able to inform us why they think there was medical negligence. As all of us know individuals frequently pass away from cancer, heart problem or organ failure even with great treatment. Nevertheless, we likewise know that individuals normally need to not die from knee surgical treatment, appendix elimination, hernia repair or some other "small" surgery. When something very unanticipated like that happens it definitely is worth exploring whether there was a medical mistake. If in doubt most medical malpractice lawyers will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Most legal representatives do not charge for an initial assessment in carelessness cases.

So what if there was (proximate cause)?

In any carelessness case not only is the burden of proof on the complainant to prove the medical malpractice the plaintiff should likewise prove that as a direct outcome of the medical carelessness some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Because medical malpractice litigation is so pricey to pursue the injuries need to be considerable to necessitate progressing with the case. All medical mistakes are "malpractice" however just a small portion of errors generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his boy to the emergency room after a skateboard mishap and the ER physician does not do x-rays regardless of an obvious bend in the kid's lower arm and informs the daddy his son has "just a sprain" this likely is medical malpractice. However, if the child is properly detected within a couple of days and makes a complete recovery it is unlikely the "damages" are extreme sufficient to carry out a suit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being correctly detected, the boy needs to have his arm re-broken and the growth plate is irreparably harmed due to the hold-up then the damages likely would call for additional examination and a possible suit.

Other essential factors to consider.

Other issues that are necessary when determining whether a client has a malpractice case consist of the victim's behavior and medical history. Did the victim do anything to cause or contribute to the bad medical outcome? A typical method of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the patient. If it is a birth trauma case, did the mama have appropriate prenatal care, did she smoke or use drugs throughout her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the physician's orders, keep his consultations, take his medicine as advised and tell the doctor the fact? truck driver murdered are truths that we need to understand in order to identify whether the doctor will have a valid defense to the malpractice claim?

Exactly what happens if it looks like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient might have been a victim of a medical error, the medical error caused a significant injury or death and the client was compliant with his medical professional's orders, then we have to get the patient's medical records. In many cases, obtaining the medical records includes absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the medical professional and/or hospital together with a letter asking for the records. In of wrongful death, an administrator of the victims estate has to be selected in the local county probate court then the administrator can sign the release asking for the records.

When the records are gotten we evaluate them to make sure they are total. It is not uncommon in medical negligence cases to receive insufficient medical charts. As soon as all the appropriate records are gotten they are supplied to a competent medical professional for evaluation and opinion. If the case is against an emergency room doctor we have an emergency room medical professional review the case, if it protests a cardiologist we have to acquire a viewpoint from a cardiologist, etc

. Mainly, exactly what we would like to know form the specialist is 1) was the healthcare provided listed below the standard of care, 2) did the violation of the standard of care result in the clients injury or death? If the medical professionals viewpoint is favorable on both counts a suit will be prepared on the customer's behalf and generally filed in the court of typical pleas in the county where the malpractice was dedicated or in the county where the offender lives. In some restricted circumstances jurisdiction for the malpractice claim could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a great malpractice attorney will carefully and thoroughly review any possible malpractice case before submitting a suit. It's unfair to the victim or the medical professionals to file a claim unless the expert tells us that he believes there is a strong basis to bring the lawsuit. Due to the expenditure of pursuing a medical negligence action no good legal representative has the time or resources to waste on a "unimportant claim."

When consulting with a malpractice legal representative it is necessary to properly provide the lawyer as much information as possible and respond to the lawyer's questions as totally as possible. Prior to talking to an attorney consider making some notes so you always remember some essential reality or scenario the legal representative might need.

Last but not least, if you believe you may have a malpractice case call a good malpractice attorney as soon as possible so there are no statute of limitations problems in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *